Saudi should have fought Israel rather than Yemen

Palestinian analysts have downplayed hopes in the recent Arab initiative for the Palestinian issue, calling it empty and warning about its likely backlashes.

They say a peace (compromise) initiative recently proposed by certain Arab and European states would lead the Palestinians towards uncertainty and would bear results worse than the outcomes of the 1993 Oslo Accord, according to Naba Press.  

Palestinian analyst, Sabet Amour says the recent efforts are an Arab-Israeli-French trap that is aimed to pull Palestinians into newer accords with the Israeli government while never meeting any Palestinian demands.

The analyst also warned about a newer round of talks with Israel in light of the regional developments and the fragile internal Palestinian conditions.

In the same regard, Amour called Egyptian Abdulfattah Sisi’s vows useless.

As for the secret ties between Saudi and Israel, the Palestinian analyst said the Saudi government only seeks its own interests.

“For them it is not important if Palestinians would reach one percent of their demands or not,” he said.

Touching on the Saudi military coalition on Yemen, the analyst said the Saudi government should have fought Israel and strived to defend the occupied al-Quds (Jerusalem) instead of going to war on Yemen.