[[{"content_id":"21489","domain_id":"0","lang_id":"en","portal_id":"2","owner_id":"29","user_id":"1","view_accesslevel_id":"0","edit_accesslevel_id":"0","delete_accesslevel_id":"0","editor_id":"0","content_title":"Why is Syria not allowed to be calm?!","content_number":"0","content_date_event":"2012-05-30 15:00:00","content_summary":"","content_summary_fill":"0","content_body":"Sadeq Mehdi Shakibayi: In 2004, former head of the Supreme council of Islamic Revolution in Iraq, Ayatollah Sayyed Muhammad Baqer Hakim was assassinated. In 2005, Rafik Hariri, former premier of Lebanon was assassinated. A question has since lingered in the minds of regional populations: “who does get benefit from the criminal acts?” Western media propaganda however blocked the way to any answer.\r\nIf anyone has provided any genuine answer to the question, the Houla massacre of Syrian children and women would have never taken place. But after all who does get benefit from the atrocity? Why a popular figure like Hakim must be assassinated when returning to country from an executed Saddam’s exile? The same question matters about Lebanon.\r\nThe answer could be any country that runs hostile to Israel must never be calm and even Syrian children and women must be beheaded to provide feeding stocks for the pro-Israeli western media. The satirical reality is that for the three countries involved (Iraq, Syria and Lebanon), the UN Security Council is at the ready to rush to the help of the three nations!\r\nWhen an initiative by the UN representative Kufi Annan was going to bear fruits, an unknown party gets to the field and ruins everything by massacring women and children and even lets BBC and Al-Jazeera to shoot the scene of massacre. Why?\r\nAnyone pursuing the Middle East developments has realized that the three countries play major roles in the Middle East equation of power and Syria proves more significant for the west in its geopolitical strategies in the region especially after the failure of all western projects in Lebanon and Iraq.\r\nSyria however has overcome any sort of problems put up by the west and a 6-article initiative by Annan is going to succeed. It has forced the west to modify its position from seeking a ‘regime change’ to seeking a ‘policy change.’ The west feared of the situation on the ground has been seeking unrest in Syria so that it could not stand as a stable front against Israel. But is that western policy worth enough to commit a horrible crime like the beheading of children and women in Syria?","content_html":"


Sadeq Mehdi Shakibayi:<\/strong> In 2004, former head of the Supreme council of Islamic Revolution in Iraq, Ayatollah Sayyed Muhammad Baqer Hakim was assassinated. In 2005, Rafik Hariri, former premier of Lebanon was assassinated. A question has since lingered in the minds of regional populations: “who does get benefit from the criminal acts?” Western media propaganda however blocked the way to any answer.<\/font><\/p>\r\n

If anyone has provided any genuine answer to the question, the Houla massacre of Syrian children and women would have never taken place. But after all who does get benefit from the atrocity? Why a popular figure like Hakim must be assassinated when returning to country from an executed Saddam’s exile? The same question matters about Lebanon.<\/font><\/p>\r\n

The answer could be any country that runs hostile to Israel must never be calm and even Syrian children and women must be beheaded to provide feeding stocks for the pro-Israeli western media. The satirical reality is that for the three countries involved (Iraq, Syria and Lebanon), the UN Security Council is at the ready to rush to the help of the three nations!<\/font><\/p>\r\n

When an initiative by the UN representative Kufi Annan was going to bear fruits, an unknown party gets to the field and ruins everything by massacring women and children and even lets BBC and Al-Jazeera to shoot the scene of massacre. Why?<\/font><\/p>\r\n

Anyone pursuing the Middle East developments has realized that the three countries play major roles in the Middle East equation of power and Syria proves more significant for the west in its geopolitical strategies in the region especially after the failure of all western projects in Lebanon and Iraq.<\/font><\/p>\r\n

Syria however has overcome any sort of problems put up by the west and a 6-article initiative by Annan is going to succeed. It has forced the west to modify its position from seeking a ‘regime change’ to seeking a ‘policy change.’ The west feared of the situation on the ground has been seeking unrest in Syria so that it could not stand as a stable front against Israel. But is that western policy worth enough to commit a horrible crime like the beheading of children and women in Syria?
<\/font><\/p>","content_source":null,"content_url":null,"content_columns":"0","content_date_start":"2012-05-30 15:00:00","content_date_finish":"2012-05-30 15:00:00","content_date_register":"2012-05-30 15:00:00","content_date_last_edit":"0000-00-00 00:00:00","content_show_img":"1","content_show_details":"1","content_show_related_img":"1","content_show_slider":"1","content_show_title_slider":"1","content_comment":"0","content_score":"0","content_recorded":"0","content_confirmed":"1","content_status":"1","content_kind":"0","old_id":"21483","tag_id":null,"tag_word":null,"tag_service":null,"tag_total":null,"tag_soundex":null,"attach_token":null,"attach_date_register":null,"attach_id":null,"attach_file_ext":null,"attach_file_header":null,"attach_img_type":null,"attach_img_width":null,"attach_img_height":null,"attach_file_media":null,"attach_show_watermark":null,"score_average":null,"score_count":null,"score_date_last":null,"visit_count":"208","visit_date_last":"2025-05-09 21:16:45","attach_title":null,"node_title":"Commentaries","ot_node_left_right":"[{\"node_id\":134, \"left\":25, \"right\":26}]"}]]