[[{"content_id":"21505","domain_id":"0","lang_id":"en","portal_id":"2","owner_id":"29","user_id":"1","view_accesslevel_id":"0","edit_accesslevel_id":"0","delete_accesslevel_id":"0","editor_id":"0","content_title":"Israel releases Adnan to avert larger scandal","content_number":"0","content_date_event":"2012-02-25 13:25:00","content_summary":"","content_summary_fill":"0","content_body":"After 66 days of hunger strike by Palestinian combatant, Khder Adnan, Israel was found no other option but to vow to release him in April. Israel however announced it would release Adnan after no evidence was found to judge against the member of Islamic Jihad so that it could present the release as part of its judicial proceedings and not as a cave-in under his robust resistance.\r\nAnalysts however believe that Israeli decision to release Adnan was out of behind-the-scene calculations and a bid to divert world public opinion from its unfair judicial proceedings and especially the case of administrative detention under which Palestinian detainees are kept for long period without any charges and until a charge is found against them.\r\n Paul Mutter, a western analyst wrote in mondoweiss.net Wednesday that Adnan's case drew attention to Israel's practice of administrative detention and that by promising to release Adnan, “the Israeli government headed off what could have been an embarrassing political and legal debacle.”\r\nThe Times too supported the idea, noting that by making the deal, Israel averted the possibility of widespread uprisings that many expected Khder Adnan had died. The daily more importantly noted that the vow to release Adnan “forestalled an emergency hearing at the High Court of Justice that could have set off a broader review of Israeli military courts’ practice of administrative detention, which has been used against thousands of Palestinians over time."\r\nInterestingly enough, New York Times in an article that seems to have been published as some feed of thought for an enquiring audience, has divulged some details about court sessions Israel holds for those in administrative detention, saying Israel for what it calls “protection of sources in the occupied territories” only informs Palestinians about outlines of their charges and gives them a “paraphrase” of the charges.\r\nAccordingly, any court session for Adnan, as a high-profile detainee, might absorbs so many attentions to the Israeli judicial conduct and therefore Israel considered it more expedient to vow to release him instead of keeping him under a sentence.","content_html":"


After 66 days of hunger strike by Palestinian combatant, Khder Adnan, Israel was found no other option but to vow to release him in April. Israel however announced it would release Adnan after no evidence was found to judge against the member of Islamic Jihad so that it could present the release as part of its judicial proceedings and not as a cave-in under his robust resistance.<\/font><\/p>\r\n

Analysts however believe that Israeli decision to release Adnan was out of behind-the-scene calculations and a bid to divert world public opinion from its unfair judicial proceedings and especially the case of administrative detention under which Palestinian detainees are kept for long period without any charges and until a charge is found against them.<\/font><\/p>\r\n

 Paul Mutter, a western analyst wrote in mondoweiss.net Wednesday that Adnan's case drew attention to Israel's practice of administrative detention and that by promising to release Adnan, “the Israeli government headed off what could have been an embarrassing political and legal debacle.”<\/font><\/p>\r\n

The Times too supported the idea, noting that by making the deal, Israel averted the possibility of widespread uprisings that many expected Khder Adnan had died. The daily more importantly noted that the vow to release Adnan “forestalled an emergency hearing at the High Court of Justice that could have set off a broader review of Israeli military courts’ practice of administrative detention, which has been used against thousands of Palestinians over time."<\/font><\/p>\r\n

Interestingly enough, New York Times in an article that seems to have been published as some feed of thought for an enquiring audience, has divulged some details about court sessions Israel holds for those in administrative detention, saying Israel for what it calls “protection of sources in the occupied territories” only informs Palestinians about outlines of their charges and gives them a “paraphrase” of the charges.<\/font><\/p>\r\n

Accordingly, any court session for Adnan, as a high-profile detainee, might absorbs so many attentions to the Israeli judicial conduct and therefore Israel considered it more expedient to vow to release him instead of keeping him under a sentence.
<\/font><\/p>","content_source":null,"content_url":null,"content_columns":"0","content_date_start":"2012-02-25 13:25:00","content_date_finish":"2012-02-25 13:25:00","content_date_register":"2012-02-25 13:25:00","content_date_last_edit":"0000-00-00 00:00:00","content_show_img":"1","content_show_details":"1","content_show_related_img":"1","content_show_slider":"1","content_show_title_slider":"1","content_comment":"0","content_score":"0","content_recorded":"0","content_confirmed":"1","content_status":"1","content_kind":"0","old_id":"21499","tag_id":null,"tag_word":null,"tag_service":null,"tag_total":null,"tag_soundex":null,"attach_token":null,"attach_date_register":null,"attach_id":null,"attach_file_ext":null,"attach_file_header":null,"attach_img_type":null,"attach_img_width":null,"attach_img_height":null,"attach_file_media":null,"attach_show_watermark":null,"score_average":null,"score_count":null,"score_date_last":null,"visit_count":"229","visit_date_last":"2025-05-09 19:41:54","attach_title":null,"node_title":"Commentaries","ot_node_left_right":"[{\"node_id\":134, \"left\":25, \"right\":26}]"}]]